This event has been cancelled.
NOTICE: To follow the G13 Toronto Misson
REVEREND ETHIER'S CHARGES: A BREAKDOWN
August 10, 2008 it is alleged that I was driving erratically on Highway 11 north close to Bracebridge Ontario. Hence, I was pulled over...the registration of the vehicle is in the name of the Tree of Life Mission... so, I think the plate was put through the system, and one thing...
[read more]
This event has been cancelled.
NOTICE: To follow the G13 Toronto Misson
REVEREND ETHIER'S CHARGES: A BREAKDOWN
August 10, 2008 it is alleged that I was driving erratically on Highway 11 north close to Bracebridge Ontario. Hence, I was pulled over...the registration of the vehicle is in the name of the Tree of Life Mission... so, I think the plate was put through the system, and one thing connects to another...the OPP officer must have smelt cannabis smoke coming from the license plate. Prior to the trial, I had an application before the court, seeking an order for prohibition, an order citing the minister of justice in contempt, an order expunging the convictions of many for unconstitutional convictions and sentences...yes you see, the pot law is dead in KKKanada. This matter proceeded before the Honourable Superior Court Justice Stong on June 16, 2010. He dismissed my applications as frivolous and vexatious. his decision is under appeal. Bachelor, a Supreme Court of Canada precedent states that the low court jurisdiction is suspended, pending such an appeal. On October 26, 2010 I had a couple of applications before the court; an application to quash the trial, and a section 7 Charter application.. Before I have a chance to say anything, the crown attorney butts in and convinces the judge that the application to quash is vexatious and frivolous. The Honourable Provincial Court Justice Beatty misinterpreted Batchelor, and, usurped his jurisdiction by proceeding with a trial...a very good ground for appeal... During the trial, the officer cannot provide any concrete evidence to my alleged erratic driving offence. The Honourable justice accepts that the officer had discretion to do so Hence, the conviction. Now, for the Section 7 application...the Honourable Justice did not give me the benefit of the doubt that I had medicinal need at the time of my arrest because I did not have in my possession an ATP at the time of the incident. For those of you familiar with the Hitzig decision...paragraph 170 states that medical necessity is a defense. However the bottom line to this is the pot law is dead for us all...and, the MMAR is unconstitutional. Now, I have very good grounds to appeal both the applications and the trial. The sentencing judge must suspend the sentencing pending the outcome of the above noted appeals...to do otherwise, he/she also usurpes his/her jurisdiction...very very good grounds for appeal. He/she must also take into consideration the ongoing court matter involving ministers of the G13 Mission. Now, as a worse case scenario, the crown is seeking 6 months incarceration. I already have a Notice of Appeal filed and served for the conviction of this matter, and I have ready, a Notice of Appeal of the sentence, to be served and filed if it is necessary. This matter is far from being over.